Unity through struggle
We will never win if we don’t understand that our greatest source of power is our unity. In a perfect world, each person would occupy their own position across a vast mosaic of revolution, fitting together alongside comrades worldwide. In our current world, particularly on the American left, we are splintered, contentious, and unorganized. We don’t have the time or competency to find everyone’s special unique spot.
We will never solve that problem if we can’t acknowledge it exists. This isn’t a criticism of any mass organization. I’m speaking to you, the reader, as an individual. If you hope to build a world founded on collective freedom, your job is to join a mass organization and get to know real people in your real life: people you can depend on, who you help, who know your face and your phone number.
And if a particular organization isn’t right for you, that’s fine—but find one that is.
Your job is to hold two things in tension: first, you have to take on the responsibility of linking up with people to change the world for the better; second, you have to learn when to shut up and follow instructions.
Throughout our history as Marxists, the most successful organizations have been committed to democratic centralism. We debate before the organization has made a decision (combat liberalism, always) but once that debate is done, you move as a unit. You hold the line. You don’t show weakness publicly. You develop internal organizational trust by literally standing together. The American left not only has few mass parties, but as individuals, we lack organizational discipline. Myself included.
As individuals, we have to feel empowered to advocate for our positions. We must be confident in our analysis, but we must also recognize that the movement is nothing without unity. So we learn to shut up and hold the line once the organization has made a decision. Hold the line, win the world.
We all know trust is hard to build. It develops piece by piece, over time, as our expectations for support are confirmed by reality. We don’t receive trust, we participate in it instead. So do your part. Engage in principled struggle, study, organization, and propaganda. Decide what you’re willing to speak about externally and what must be worked out internally. Build trust with your comrades. And know that it runs both ways. We follow instructions we believe in, leadership listens when membership is committed and invested. We need to be heard while simultaneously doing what we’re told.
God-willing, our organizations will grow and change. But as new people join, the character of what we are trying to accomplish will shift, whether we want it to or not. Leadership must stay ahead of that curve, and rank and file must trust and implement the direction being set.
We earn the right to criticize through organizational participation. Leadership develops trust by synthesizing membership observations; membership develops trust with leadership by executing. We will only win if we are unified, through inevitable struggle. We must harness momentum because nothing successful can escape change.
We need unity now more than ever, because our enemy is militant and resourced. They can afford to fake commitment—paying people to show up, to perform strength in front of perceived weakness. But they will never sacrifice for a victory they don’t see as inevitable. That is our greatest strength. We fight because we have to. We’ll win because we have to. The fate of the world depends on it.
We serve the people. Dare to struggle, dare to win.

I have gone back to read your piece again because I honestly do not want to mis-read you. So let me quote the parts I am speaking to directly. The following five quotations come directly from your piece.
“We don’t have the time or competency to find everyone’s special unique spot.’
“Your job is to hold two things in tension: first, you have to take the responsibility to linking up with people to change the world for the better; second, you have to learn when to shut up and follow instructions.”
‘You don’t show weakness publicly.”
“Hold the line. Win the world.”
“We serve the people.”
I agree that we live in a world dominated by power and this will not disappear as a result of wishing it were so. Yet doing ‘power’ in the same vein does nothing to alter our lived realities. However, creating circles in which people, individually and collectively, find, develop, nurture and live their ‘special unique spot’ is a radical undermining of power today.
Shutting up and following instructions, NOT showing weakness in public, ‘holding the line’ against all personal good conscience, the idea that we (whoever that may be) can ‘’win the WORLD’ and the idea that we (the good ones) are truly serving ‘the people’ (them over there) like the priests of old… These ways of thinking and doing are deeply part of the empire project itself. The more we cling to them, the more we serve empire – perhaps of a different name, yet it is still empire. As Audre Lord alluded to, the master’s tools will never destroy the master’s house.
Imagine a world where people all deeply find their ‘zone’; where monoculture dies with every person who takes one more tiny step towards their uniqueness and away from fitting in; where no one media can ‘harvest’ our attention because our attention is so multifaceted and multidirectional, where thousands of small formations dance a million eddies of difference creating this amazing and persistent change, breadth, and depth of human reality.
The reality of military discipline is exclusively death-dealing. That’s it. Life demands multiplicity of unlimited dimensions. As long as our ‘alternatives’ remain rooted in this clinging to illusions of military might (even if it’s called militancy), we are circling the same drain.
Books to crack open our imaginations that speak to crazy and wonderful alternative strategies and lives: Kazu Haga’s Healing Resistance: A Radically Different Response to Harm; Erica Chenoweth’s Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know; Kelly Hayes and Mariame Kaba’s Let This Radicalize You: Organizing the Revolution of Reciprocal Care; Karen Barad’s Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning; Resmaa Menakem’s The Quaking of America; and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson’s Theory of Water: Nishnaabe Maps to the Times Ahead.
Oh… where to begin? I enjoyed your discussion on Bad Faith, with Briana and so I thought to go in search of what else you say…and I came across this post.
My problem with this post: the persistence of the idea that it is ever a good idea to “shut up and do as you are told” and that a progressive push for creating another, better world would hold to this old beaten and broken beast as key to success…
The poison is in the potion, and I don’t understand why this is not obvious. As a person who grew up - admittedly many decades ago, in a different world - where ‘shut up and do as you are told’ was sacred at church, at school, at home, I simply will never again agree to working with people who hold to this as a good strategy. This may be in the cause of communism and not of capitalism, but the heart of the beast remains identical and hence the outcome may have different hair and tattoos, but will be the same at heart - domination.
Surely, surely, surely we can go one step further and leave domination behind… and then capitalism may simply die for lack of air…